hannahswiv: the boris has special hair in that photoJamie: doesn't he justOh Boris. But, once again, you're the loveable Tory who says sensible things, this time badmouthing both Labour policy and those from the last Tory manifesto (written by one David Cameron;
from the BBC):
Mr Johnson said: "I certainly don't believe in some government target of 50% university admissions, but that is because I don't believe in targets or quotas or indeed in many of the other positively harmful instruments that are currently used to control universities. "But by the same token, I certainly don't believe in some mad plan to try to compel a certain proportion of people to stick to vocational courses and thereby reduce university numbers."
In his speech Mr Johnson evoked the Thomas Hardy novel Jude the Obscure, in which the eponymous hero is denied a place at university because of his impoverished background.
He said: "It's no use saying to people 'It's all right sonny, you can be a stonemason, or you can pack my bags at the supermarket checkout while I go off and be a lawyer.'
"Even if we thought it right that we should tell people to stick to being stonemasons, there is the practical objection: how do you physically stop people enrolling for Mickey Mouse courses without crass invasions of academic freedom?
"You can't. And then there is a moral objection."
I'll just say what I've been saying for years (not that anyone listens):
increasing numbers is not the same as increasing accessibility. Okay, yes, it's lovely for the government to be able to say that now we have many more students going into Higher Education; but exactly how many of those new students actually come from lower-income households? I have a feeling that by increasing numbers, what's actually happening is that there are more and more middle-class children going to Uni; given that the reason that there are no more grants is that there are so many students that it's not possible to give out even means-tested grants anymore, it seems to me that the attempt to drive up numbers actually harms the ability of the poorest in society to attend. If numbers were reduced to a certain extent... well, maybe there would be more flexible ways of getting the limited amount of money to those students who really need it. And it would reduce the impossible teaching loads... (I have to teach elementary Latin to 50 students next year... moan, moan, bitch, bitch).
And, well, micky mouse subjects... I can't moan about I.R. not being a real subject anymore, partly because fellow I.R. basher Mal has now done a flippin' Masters in it, and also because Classics and I.R. have got into bed together up here with the Constitutions project (paid for by Sean Connery, no less); but Film Studies started up here, so that's my new target. Classics, blah, blah, real work, blah, expanding the mind, snort, 2000 years of philology, blah... But I guess B.J. has a point too.
Anyway. Points to Boris for talking about
Jude the Obscure, the only decent thing that Hardy ever wrote.
Oh, and Dave Cameron nearly said something interesting in his attack on the way that BHS were selling inappropriate children's clothes; master of the market claimed that:
"I've never believed that we can leave everything to market forces...I'm not prepared to turn a blind eye if the system sometimes leaves casualties in its wake"
It almost sounds as though you mean it, Dave. Just a pity you picked on a line of clothing that BHS stopped selling 3 years ago...